Ripping Book Review–Les Miserables…Yes, it’s sad.

Victor Hugo-CosetteSepia

Victor Hugo-CosetteSepia (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

WARNING: Ripping Book Reviews are solely the judgments of Professor VJ Duke on an unlucky book that has caused him much repulsion—in one way or another. Therefore, blame must be put on the professor and nobody else. With that in mind, read on—if you are brave enough to take it.

LES MISERABLES by VICTOR HUGO

I’ve heard that the latest movie is highly rippable. But since I didn’t watch it, and I haven’t ripped any movies (though, maybe I should?), the book just popped to mind.

The professor read Les Miserables a few years back, and at the time, it did cause some repulsion. And repulsion, dear readers, can’t be forgiven—even if it is only slight.

Firstly, I think a translation of the title would be beneficial. I’ve heard so many different title options in English, and the French one is hardly pronounceable. So, Les Miserables can be translated from French to mean: The Miserable, The Wretched, The Miserable Ones, The Poor Ones, The Wretched Poor, The Victims, or The Dispossessed.

Now, instead of berating Hugo for such an ambiguous title (after all, it might not have been his fault), I would rather focus on his meaning in the title. You see, throughout the novel there are many characters that can be described as miserable or wretched. In fact, I would suggest that there’s not another book in the whole world where the author has it out for his characters as much as in Les Miserables. Every time there is hope, love, and goodness, Hugo seems to enjoy quenching the good feelings immediately. So, in this sense, the book definitely lives up to its title. But I think Hugo had a different meaning in mind.

But before we can get to that, I must make a few things clear.

(1) The novel is approximately 510,000 words. Yes, this is painful—especially when the author has such a hard time following the story.

(2) Throughout the novel, there are little ‘breaks’ in the story. Every so often, Hugo will kindly deposit pages and pages (too many pages, actually) upon the reader that have absolutely nothing to do with the story. These fun little topics range from battle analysis (something we definitely don’t want to hear from a person who is bitter about Napoleon’s Waterloo defeat) and languages, to sewers. That’s right: sewers. The deposit on sewers is particularly long and boring. In fact, it even makes one nervous.

Consequently, then, as you make your way through the story, you are confronted with the fun little topics. Of course, the story is interesting, and you, as the reader, are desirous to know the end. But Hugo, in his ever doubtful mind, decided to come up with a test. By incorporating horrid thick chunks of nothingness in his story, every so often, he was determining the readers’ interest in his manuscript. You see, if the reader was able to read through the ‘chunks’ and continue on, it would prove that the story was quite interesting. If, however, the reader was stuck and could continue no more, it proved that the story wasn’t interesting enough to undergo the torture.

It was definitely an interesting test—one that is extremely…pointless.

So…the title…

Now it makes sense.

The title refers not to the characters, but to the reader! For by the time one is through those rotten ‘chunks’ he is definitely quite miserable himself! Miserable for having to go through a ‘chunk;’ miserable for having to suspend the story; and miserable because he knows more are on the way.

Hugo decided to make all of the characters lead miserable lives just so the title wasn’t obvious. For who would read a book designed to make one miserable?

Okay…plot…

(Contrary to popular belief, the characters do not go about singing when they should be speaking!)

I think we’ll do something slightly different today: A character breakdown. Just the protagonist and the antagonist, mind you.

Jean Valjean: is the protagonist of the story. He is an ex-convict who is extremely strong and…dim is a good descriptive word, I think. After being shown mercy from a priest, Valjean is pathetic, hopeless, and humiliated for the rest of the tale. In fact, he would have saved himself many problems had he respected himself. Throughout the novel, Valjean is described as being very, very, very, very physically strong. He can climb walls, take more pain than an ox, and best any man at any time. Of course, this gave a definite description to the professor. I pictured Valjean as a small, thickset person with shoulders the width of five feet at least!

Now, the antagonist might surprise you, but when given thought, it makes perfect sense: Marius. Yes, Marius is the antagonist. Valjean was doing fine, and would have probably been just fine, had it not been for the advent of that youthful, bloodsucking insect, Marius. Marius perpetuated the death of Valjean; Marius pulled Cosette (Valjean’s adopted daughter) from Valjean; Marius insulted the man who had saved his life by dragging him through a sewer. (Yes, that is why we had to have a ‘chunk’ on the sewers in Paris. Of course, had Valjean a heart, he would have not carried Marius through the sewer. Then Hugo would have had no excuse for causing the reader more misery.) In fact, if Jean Valjean’s life had been miserable before, with the advent of Marius it became wretched!

Early on, Valjean refers to Marius as a ‘booby!’ If he had only known!

Certainly, Cosette can be blamed too, along with Marius, for Valjean’s collapse. But we must remember something. Cosette had her brains beaten out by her masters during her childhood. Therefore, we must understand her utter stupidity and forgive it slightly!

Now, Javert…the inspector; the mirror of Valjean; the insecure, humiliated, wretched, inspector. Throughout the novel, Javert is chasing Valjean. It ends when he figures out that Valjean is good, despite having been bad in the past. Of course, this vexes Javert. How can one be good, bad, good, bad, and good again? Is such a thing possible? Javert struggles with the possibilities for awhile before giving up and drowning himself. Either he figured it was possible, or it drove him to craziness.

Now, Hugo wasn’t done. Not one character could be truly happy at the end of the book if his title was to remain a deception.

After a heartbreakingly dimwitted scene, Valjean dies. Then, Hugo skips into the future to show the reader one last ‘happy’ scene: a gravestone. No name can be read on the stone, only four lines which are faded. We know this is Valjean’s grave just because of the pathetic nature of things. The four lines read:

He is asleep. Though his mettie was sorely tried,
He lived, and when he lost his angel, died.
It happened calmly, on its own,
The way night comes when day is done.

The angel almost definitely refers to Cosette. So, maybe she should be blamed a little more?

I would give almost anything to know who was responsible for this unmarked, uncared for gravestone. Marius? Or Cosette?

It definitely drives one to craziness, and dangerously close to the water’s edge!

Advertisements

22 Responses to “Ripping Book Review–Les Miserables…Yes, it’s sad.”


  1. 1 jeannemeeks June 25, 2013 at 02:03

    Enjoyed the rip! I agree with most of your review… and the movie was just as depressing.

    • 2 Professor VJ Duke June 25, 2013 at 15:26

      Thank you! But the whole review is agreeable! :) Which movie are you referring to? I’ve seen the un-musical one.

  2. 3 wordsaver June 21, 2013 at 17:39

    Hugo was fantastic and nice when I was reading him, but I could never read till the end some others like Tolstoy.And nothing compares to Quasimodo!

    • 4 Professor VJ Duke June 22, 2013 at 19:06

      I know! Quasimodo! I tried that one; couldn’t finish it!

  3. 5 J.E. Rule June 19, 2013 at 13:13

    Yet, another good ripping. However, I might argue that George R.R. Martin may have it more out for his characters in The Game of Thrones. No one may make it out alive!

    • 6 Professor VJ Duke June 19, 2013 at 14:29

      Ooo, you’re right. Maybe Martin should top the list, then?

  4. 7 safia June 19, 2013 at 12:04

    Thank you Prof – I’m deleting it from my Kindle immediately. There really is no such thing as a free lunch.

    • 8 Professor VJ Duke June 19, 2013 at 14:29

      Well, if you did get it for free…you might want to read a little bit. It is somewhat interesting. Just skip the chunks!

      • 9 safia June 19, 2013 at 14:49

        Thanks for the tip. I’ll wait ’til I’m feeling really down one day and give it a go – might cheer me up.

      • 10 Professor VJ Duke June 19, 2013 at 14:50

        It just might! Heck, sewers would cheer anybody up! It made me laugh! :)

  5. 11 Shakti Ghosal June 19, 2013 at 10:02

    Interesting reading your review.

    I suppose quite some part of the perspective you have brought in has to do with our inability to live and breathe “another time, another place.” How do you suppose ‘The Girl with the dragon tattoo’ would be reviewed a couple of centuries hence?

    Shakti

    • 12 Professor VJ Duke June 19, 2013 at 14:28

      Actually, I think my reviews are independent of another time or another place. You see, I would have reviewed the above book the same in Hugo’s time as I did now. Flaws are flaws. The professor is a cynical beast, much like Mark Twain.

      As far as the ‘The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo’ is concerned…I’ve never read it, and probably never will. But it would be safe to assume that I would rip it as badly in 2013 as I would in 2513! Time should not affect the merit of a work!

      Remember, the only author that is un-rippable is Mark Twain! :)

  6. 13 ladycheetah7 June 18, 2013 at 23:37

    Thank you for helping me avoid the mistake of buying the book. I think I will spend $1.50 to rent the movie instead

    • 14 Professor VJ Duke June 19, 2013 at 14:15

      Absolutely!

  7. 15 The Hook June 18, 2013 at 17:46

    My daughter LOVED the film and I think you’ve inspired me to read the book.
    Thanks!

    • 16 Professor VJ Duke June 19, 2013 at 14:15

      The book is interesting–besides the ‘chunks’, of course! Did your daughter like the newest (musical) film, or the older one?

  8. 17 Susan P June 18, 2013 at 16:58

    I have attempted three times to read through this book and aborted mission in chapter three. Each time I found something more fun to do like cleaning out the cat’s litter box. A friend, an English teacher no less, has loaned me her own abridged copy of it. I’ve had it for almost a year and it is still sitting there where I left it. I have a tower of books I desire to read, and it is not in that pile. I would return it, but I’m afraid she might want to have a discussion and make me write a term paper about it. ;)

    • 18 Professor VJ Duke June 19, 2013 at 14:14

      :lol: That’s hilarious, Susan! The last thing I’d want to do is write a term paper about it! Yuck!

      • 19 Susan P June 19, 2013 at 19:21

        Well, I did see it on Broadway, and there were no “chunks” in that production.

      • 20 Professor VJ Duke June 19, 2013 at 20:18

        I’m sure. The ‘chunks’ would have been horrible on stage. I’m not even sure how you would go about a sewer… How was it, by the way?

  9. 21 FictionFan June 18, 2013 at 16:43

    I always assumed the title probably meant this one wouldn’t be a barrel of laughs! But sewers?? Good grief! Miserable, indeed! Thanks for taking the hit on this one so I know not to… :) …or perhaps that should be :(

    • 22 Professor VJ Duke June 19, 2013 at 14:13

      I know. The sewers were really, really tough. But, you know, Bob would want you to read it…


Say something...anything...O Punchy Family!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




TPL Schedule

Sunday: OFF — Day of Shalt Nots

Monday: TPL Story

Tuesday: OFF — Because I'm Gone

Wednesday: Professor Speaks

Thursday: OFF — Because Yes

Friday: OFF — All Day Sleep Does

Saturday: OFF — Blue-Footed Boobies Need Fed

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email!

Join 1,873 other followers

Follow The Punchy Lands! on WordPress.com

Blog Stats

  • 115,253 hits

Join the Professor on Twitter!

Professorish Smiley:

==[:-{)=

or

==[:-{)+

Depends on the day, see.

Punchy Argot:

1. Dadblameit.
2. Humdinger
3. Chickit
4. Chicky-woot-woot
5. Malediction
6. Rapscallion
7. Gardoobled
8. Congratulilolations
9. Togoggin
10. Gargonic
11. Two and Five Gurgles
12. Rats and a Heifer
13. Two nods, a wink, and an astroid
14. A bit, bits, and little bits
15. Huff-Hum and a Roar
16. So many thanks, I can't begin to thank you
17. Ri-do-diculous


%d bloggers like this: